Locked Up Final Draft

Question 7

Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to full product?



During the process of our prelim task I learn a lot about camera shots and techniques, editing on premiere and I learnt about genres that I hadn't heard of before. All this came in good use when making my final film opening and I was able to use these skills I had learnt to produce to the best of my ability.

For our prelim task we were given the genre 'Urban Teen Drama' which I wasn't that familiar with. But with research put in I found out that 'Skins' and 'Top Boy' were Urban Teen Drama's that I could get ideas from for my prelim task when looking at the appearance of the actors, story lines and locations. Urban Teen Dramas include rough, low standard people that are into drugs and crime and walk around the streets or are in a school. We took the idea of them being in a school and started to produce our storyboard in which we learnt to label what was happening in each scene, timings of each scene, the camera shots and sound effects. With this research and planning I was able to produce my prelim task knowing what each are my shots were going to be in each scene such as the 180 degree shot, long shot and tracking shot. We also thought of a typical story line that would suit an Urban Teen Drama well about a girl who goes to school dealing drugs with a boy that doesn't go to school and committing crimes in the process. With the storyboard it was easy to know what camera shots we needed to use for each specific scene for example the 180 degree shot for the interview. This made the process run quicker and easier.
My tracking shot has improved because we started off tracking with the camera by hand but now we have learnt how to use the tripod and found this more effective. We have also used shots better for specific scenes and found out which shots work better.For example the long shot worked best on the teacher catching the girl and drug dealer as it gives us the impression that nobody else was around and it was just them and the picture, a close up wouldn't have given much away. We improved our drug dealing scene as first of all it was a long shot and we couldn't hear what they were saying in their conversation so we changed it to a close up. We are  more confident with the equipment now as we know how the camera works and it's attachments that are used to upload the videos onto a computer and we know how the tripod can easily make a scene look better by different heights or the smoothness of the shot.
Overall I think our prelim task went well considering it was our first time practicing making up our own story, using our own camera shots and still learning how to edit. Although we didn't meet all of our tasks as our brief production diary wasn't evident and not all of the shots were included, we had our genre conventions, task idea, title and script included and our storyboard. We used premiere mostly to produce our prelim task but also used Prezi to present our research.     


Question 6

Question 5



Question 4

Representation

Locked Up Final Draft

Shooting Schedule


Audience Research

Who are you targeting?
We are targeting an intellectual adult crowd as our film is rated a 15. As the documentary is a story that could come across as violent and scary we believe people mainly 18 and over will watch something like this although people 15 and over can watch. It is a serious crime that may be harmful to some viewers.  

Who is most likely to see your film?










Who is your primary and secondary audience?

Institution

Music



We had this song choice as it shows a deep meaning and shows how serious these events were in 'Locked Up'. This song also creates a sense of sympathy and sadness.

Improvements

Most criticism given was about the genre not being evident enough. A lot of people thought our film opening was either a drama, thriller or crime which evidently isn't clear that it is in fact a documentary. Having three different views of our genre wouldn't give us potential of high marks so we researched more documentary's such as The Imposter and were given lots of ideas from that which would hopefully make our genre more evident.

Although our feedback about the genre wasn't great we had some good feedback given about our editing. We were given comments such as 'good mix of shots. music worked well' and 'music is good at adding tension and an atmosphere'. The majority of the comments were 'good editing' but we knew there were some improvements that we still needed to make as we still did get some criticism such as 'need to try a few new effects' so I took this criticism on board and added effects dissolving different scenes in and out and changed the volume of the music at different scenes.

It was vital that we considered what people believed we needed to change. When asked what we needed to change people said 'make transition between scenes clearer' so we changed the close up of the door handle and made it flow better. We noticed that a lot of people criticized our interview so we made this shorter and only used the interesting parts of the interview. I also noticed how the interview didn't flow with the actual film and was a bit random so I made it link better so it made more sense.

When given our mark out of 60 we were given a big range and were rated between 20-45. Although some marks were good we also realised some weren't as good so we knew we had to improve on this.    

Feedback






Opening Title Productions



In our film opening we have been inspired by the opening of The Imposter so have used the same production companies to make ours look similar and more like a documentary.

Blog Reflection

Technology
I have come across a new online programme, Photo Bucket, which I have used to present my location pictures for my film opening. New premiere effects that I have found and used are Audio Transitions which I haven't used before when previously using premiere. 

What mark out of 20 is it so far?
I would consider my blog being a 14 out of 20 so far as I haven't completed all 50 posts yet and I haven't kept up to date with everything but from what I have produced I feel I have done well because not too far behind and my blog is well presented. Also all my labels are up to date and well organised. 

Where could you be a little more thorough or a little less complacent?
I believe I could be more thorough in my evaluations of my work and give more detail. I also need to keep up to date with evaluating my work as I am behind on that. I don't think I have been too complacent throughout my work and have been honest. 

Is it fun to look through?
I think my blog is quite fun to look through as it isn't dull and boring with a boring black background but instead I have film images as the background and an interesting font. My blog also includes lots of images and clips that appeal to people more than looking at loads of writing. Although writing is needed throughout my work I haven't put loads of pointless detail on my posts. 

Is the learning journey evident?
Most of my posts are all in order of the process of making my film opening and all the research that was done prior to making this. I have made it clear where I have got my ideas from and shown clear evidence of what me and my group were doing throughout this. I have shown research on titles which I spent many hours doing. My learning journey is very evident as well as I have kept up to date with making the production diary. 

Three targets to improve blog - research or planning (have you thoroughly covered all key media concepts - forms and conventions of your film , audience, institution, representation)
  • Research- I believe I should have shown more research about other film openings for top films with the same genre as this would have given me more ideas for my film opening. 
  • Planning- My shooting schedule could have been shown in a word document format so the writing was clearer to read and understand. 
  • Posts- I need to update my blog with more media concepts such as the forms and conventions of my film, audience, institution, representation and improvements from the feedback given. 

Characters and Roles

Sophie (Me)- Editor and Actor
I have organised in planning the film by doing the storyboard including all the shots, camera techniques and length of the shots. I have also given everyone their roles and made sure everything is organised. I am also acting as the interviewer as I interview the neighbour in the film.

Aaron- Director
Aaron has been given the role of editing our whole film opening adding all the titles and effects and is in control of all the filming, lighting, sound effects, animations etc. He is also producing a newspaper article used in our film opening.

James- Actor and Planner
James is the main actor in the film being the Psycho that has been kidnapped at the age of 13 for 15 years. He also provided the shooting schedule which our whole group will use.

Harrison- Actor and Photographer
Harrison is acting as the neighbour of Josiah's kidnapper. He finds Josiah in the cabin and reports it to the police. He has also taken images the in and outside of the cabin.

Shooting Risk Assessment


This is an image of our Shooting Risk Assessment form that Aaron has filled in. Our main risks were travelling to our venue by train, electrical shock hazards, tripping over wires for our lighting and slipping in wet conditions in the rain.

Location Images

Storyboard Video

Storyboard






This is the storyboard I have made. My group helped me with ideas and had a previous draft before this which we have no improved on.

Production Diary

Day 1 (13th November)- Me, Aaron, James and Harrison all discussed and shared our individual pitches to each other and all decided on the best one to present to the class. We decided to present James' as his had the best story line. After we had presented we then decided a whole new idea which was to do a documentary and James started to plan the prezi for this.

Day 2 (14th November)- Our prezi was created for our documentary and we presented it to the class. Good feedback was given back to us for us to improve and we didn't get much criticism. With the feedback we then made a few changes to our storyline and then was discussed with Miss Brookes.

Day 3 (17th November)- Our group sat together and decided on all the improvements for our final film pitch. We then starting our sources we will be using in the film so Aaron created a newspaper article which will be used in our film. Me, James and Harrison also helped by giving him ideas.

Day 4- (18th November)- Today we began to plan our storyboard, these images show evidence of this.


Day 5 (20th November- Me, Aaron, James and Harrison started blogging for preparation for our film pitch.

Day 6 (21th November) - Aaron, James and Harrison have started to prepare the voice over. I have now completed the storyboard and our group are now filming our storyboard.

Day 7 (25th November)- We have all continued to plan and create our storyboard. Timings for each scene have now also been added and we are now ready to start making the storyboard video.

Day 8 (26th November)- Aaron, James and Harrison filmed the storyboard and also did the voice over for it. James was the voice over for the storyboard and Aaron recorded him. Whilst doing this Harrison was designing the wall for his cabin that we are using in our film.

Day 9 (2nd December)- Today we have continued to blog our progress and will soon be preparing our film as most of our scenes have no been filmed the previous weekend. I have also now uploaded the storyboard film and have given evidence of us planning our work.

Day 10 (4th December)- Today me, Harrison, Aaron and James have continued filming our interviewing at school in the drama studio. We have learnt about lighting and camera angles during this process and we are now starting to edit our film as our first draft.

Day 11 (5th December)- I have started to record the storyboard film and finish filming our last scenes of the film opening. Aaron and James have continued to edit our film and Harrison has helped me with the filming of the storyboard.

Day 12 (8th December)- Today we gave feedback to other groups film drafts and also got our feedback back.

Day 13 (9th December)- We used our feed back to improve on our film draft and i continued to edit our film. Aaron, James and Harrison were blogging whilst I was doing this.

Day 14 (10th December)- We have re-filmed our interview as from our feedback we realised our interview wasn't very good and we have added thing to our film so the interview makes more sense.

Day 15 (11th December)- I continued to edit our film whilst James has gathered videos to be added into it. Harrison has carried on producing the newspaper article which James also helped him with and Aaron has been listing our shooting schedule.

Day 16 (12th December)- We presented our film to Miss and got feedback on it which we used to edit our film in order to improve it. Me and Aaron both edited it whilst James and Harrison did the newspaper article and re-did the voice over.

Day 17 (15th December)- Today is our last day of making our film and we have made the last improvements to our film. Whilst I edited Aaron, James and Harrison continued to blog. 

Group Film Pitch- Locked Up

Titles Task- The Conjuring

T1: Directed By James Wan
From Start: 17 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T2: Writters
From Start: 24 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds

T3: Producers
From Start: 28 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T4: Executive Producers
From Start: 34 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds

T5: Director Of Photography  
From Start: 37 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T6: Production Designer
From Start: 44 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds

T7: Editor 
From Start: 48 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T8: Actors
From Start: 1:14 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T9: Actors
From Start: 1:18 Seconds 
Duration: 5 Seconds

T10: Casting
From Start: 1:24 Seconds
Duration: 5 Seconds

T11:
From Start: 1:29 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T12: Music
From Start: 1:35 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T13: A New Line Cinema Production
From Start: 1:39 Seconds   
Duration: 4 Seconds


T14:
From Start: 1:45 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds

T15: A James Wan Film
From Start: 1:49 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds

T16: Title of Film
From Start: 1:56 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds




Titles Task- Psycho (1998)

T1: Universal Pictures and Imagine Entertainment
From Start: 6 Seconds
Duration: 6 Seconds
T2: Psycho (Title)
From Start: 12 Seconds
Duration: 7 Seconds
T3: Vince Vaughn
From Start: 21 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds
T4: Starring- Julianne Moore
From Start: 25 Seconds
Duration: 2 Seconds
T5: Starring- Viggo Mortensen
From Start: 29 Seconds
Duration: 2 Seconds
T6: Starring- William H. Macy
From Start: 33 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds
T7: List of actors
From Start: 39 Seconds 
Duration: 6 Seconds
T8: Anne Heche (Actor)
From Start: 46 Seconds
Duration: 6 Seconds
T9: Casting- Howard Feuer
From Start: 52 Seconds 
Duration: 3 Seconds
T10: Music- Bernard Herrmann
From Start: 57 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds
T11: Music Producers
From Start: 1:02 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds
T12: Beatrix Aruna Pasztor
From Start: 1:07 Seconds
Duration: 2 Seconds
T13: Editor- Amy E. Duddleston
From Start: 1:12 Seconds 
Duration: 2 Seconds
T14: Production Designer- Tom Foden 
From Start: 1:15 Seconds
Duration: 5 Seconds
T15: Director of Photography
From Start: 1:22 Seconds
Duration: 3 Seconds
T16: Executive Producer- Dany Wolf  
From Start: 1:25 Seconds
Duration: 2 Seconds
T17: Producers  
From Start:1:31 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds
T18: Screenplay- Joseph Stefano
From Start: 1:36 Seconds
Duration: 4 Seconds
T19: Director- Gus Van Sant
From Start: 1:41 Seconds
Duration: 7 Seconds

The titles in this film opening are all in capitals and have a white, bold font. Many thrillers tend to use capitals and bold writing like this film. The titles are all animated the same on green lines to a black background. The music in the background is very tension building and has the effect of a thriller as the tension shows something scary or strange is going to happen. The use of black, green and white colours shows it isn’t a very uplifting film as they are dim, boring colours, although the use of green shows it as more of a thriller. 

Elements of our Opening Sequence

Characters
Sophie Vale: Interviewer
James Grimley: Psycho
Aaron Beard: Neighbour
Harrison:  Kidnapper

Location
Harrison’s garden and cabin
Drama Studio

Narrative/Plot
An interview will take place with a man of 30 who is recovering from living in his kidnapper’s cabin for 15 years when he was just 15 years old. Throughout this film opening we will show evidence of the conditions the man lived in and talk about how the psycho was found. We imagine the man as a psycho because the conditions he lived in turned him mental.

Genre
Our genre is a documentary. Although it comes across as a thriller we are showing the life of the psycho in a documentary and then interviewing them.

Themes
Real life events
Professional Voice-Over
Direct and Indirect Interviews
Reenactment

 

Film Opening Analysis- Unspoken



I would give this film opening a low level 4 as it only shows some levels of excellence. The titles are used appropriately according to institutional conventions and the editing of the titles have been produced well. Each title blends in well with each scene and has interesting conventions. Also a variety of shots have been used to show key details and sound effects have been used appropriately for example the rustling of the paper in the bag. It is made apparent that the film opening is a mystery/crime and not too much is given away which makes it more interesting.

Film Opening Analysis- The Visitor



I would give this film opening a level 4 as it shows some level of excellence. Titles are used appropriately and the titles are effective make it seem like more of a horror. I also liked the close up shots as it gives the impression that the girl isn't human and may be in fact a spirit. The shots of her fading away also gives this impression. I found this opening interesting because it doesn't give too much away like a trailer and leaves on an interesting cliff hanger which makes you want to watch further. The sound was also good with the whispering in the background which makes it more sinister and scary. The higher volume at the end of the film opening makes it more jumpy. Overall I'd give 55 out of 60 it has shown level 4 criteria.

Individual Film Pitch

Self Evaluation of Prelim Task


1) Who did you work with and how did you manage the task between you?
I did my prelim task with Deborah and James Grimley. We managed our task together well as we all agreed on the way we were producing each scene and all worked together taking turns to use the camera to film them. Each of us had a character to play and we improvised our characters so we all had an input in the way the characters were presented.  

2) How did you plan your sequence? What processes did you use? What theories did you try to take in to account?
We thought of all our different ideas and wrote them down then decided as a group what we thought was best. What we chose to do was by far the best option out of all of them. We used a storyboard to plan out each scene as well and labelled how each of the camera shots were going to be used. We took into account the narrative theory when planning out prelim.

3) What technology did you use to complete the task, and how did you use it?
We used a video camera to film our prelim and an iPhone. The iPhone was used during a scene where Deborah was texting the drug dealer. This was a good example of a close up shot.

4) What factors did you have to take into account when planning, shooting and editing?
When planning we needed to make sure the scenes were the right genre and as it was an urban teen drama we needed to make sure we made it seem like a typical urban teen drama. When shooting we planned out how long we were going to film each scene then when editing we were able to cut out scenes that were too long or when we had stopped acting. When editing, we also made the scenes flow by creating transitions within each scene.

5) How successful was your sequence? Please identify what worked well, and with hindsight, what would you improve/do differently? What did others say about your production?
I don’t believe our prelim was as successful as we hoped for. Although what worked well was the use of hoodies and a gun to present an image of urban. Our alleyway scene and the interview scene with the 180 degree shot were scenes that worked best in our prelim. If we could start our prelim again and do it differently we would include a scene of a close up of the door handle when Deborah goes for the interview and to make the whole storyline more realistic. The comments that were given for our prelim were mostly positive. They commented on the good music, our different shots and transitions and how it was a clear story.


6) What have you learnt from completing this task? Looking ahead, how will this learning be significant when completing the rest of your foundation coursework, do you think?

I have learn a lot during making my prelim. I have a better understanding of camera shots that I could use next time and I think lighting that could be included would improve my prelim. Seeing other peoples prelim’s, I have also learnt how to make scenes more interesting with different effects and I now have a better knowledge of music that can be played in the prelim. One other major point that I have learnt is you don’t need to give away too much in a small scene therefore you can make it more interesting by leaving a cliff hanger.


Prezi Prelim Task


Prelim Storyboard



Representation

Definitions

Representation- The way in which people, events and ideas are presented to the audience.

Stereotypes- Media institutions use stereotypes because the audience will instantly understand them.Stereotypes are thought of as a 'visual short cut'. They are used so frequently that we believe they are normal or true.

Archetypes- The ultimate stereotype.

Counter-types- A representation that challenges the typical stereotype of a person, place or group of people.

Gatekeepers- Any person who is involved in a media production with the power to make decisions about what the audience are allowed to read, hear and see or not see. For example a newspaper editor has the final say on what is shown in the newspaper, the pictures shown and the title's of the different pieces.

Media Moguls- A media proprietor or media mogul refers to a successful entrepreneur or businessperson who controls, through personal ownership or via a dominant position in any media related company or enterprise consumed by a large number of individuals.

Media Consumers- Media consumption or media diet is the sum of information and entertainment media taken in by an individual or group. It includes activities such as interacting with new media; reading books and magazines; watching television and film; listening to radio; and so on.

When analysing representation we have to take into consideration the following things:

Who? (Is being represented? Is the preferred audience for the representation?)
What? (Are they doing? Is their activity presented as typical (normal) or atypical (abnormal)? Do they conform the genre expectations or other conventions)
Why? (Are they present? What purpose do they serve?)
Where? (Are they? How are they framed? Are they presented as artificial or natural? What surrounds them? What is in the foreground? What is in the background?)

Theories

The Male Gaze- Developed by feminist, Laura Mulvey describes how the audience, or viewer, is put into the perspective of a heterosexual male. Mulvey believes that women should enjoy the attention of attracting the gaze, and put themselves in positions to be looked at. The concept of ‘the gaze’ is one that deals with how an audience views the people/person presented. Mulvey states that in film women are typically the objects, rather than the possessors, of gaze because the control of the camera (and thus the gaze) comes from factors such as the as the assumption of heterosexual men as the default target audience for most film genres.

Richard Dyer- Richard Dyer’s Star Theory is the idea that icons and celebrities are constructed by institutions for financial reasons and are built to target a specific audience or group of people. Dyer’s theory can be broken down into 3 sections:

  • Audience and Institutions
  • Constructions
  • Hegemony (Cultural Beliefs)
 



Institution Task


Juno Practise Task



You are editing your own footage, how did the filming go?
I think our filming went well as we used the time wisely by using one and a half lessons to complete the Juno task to the best of our ability. Some issues did occur during filming though as it was difficult to get the angle right and know which way to face. As you can see in the video I'm going in the wrong direction to the original Juno video. Although I think the timing of the runners was successful and also when we panned up towards the telephone wires. 

Was your storyboard accurate?
My storyboard was accurate as we wrote about the positioning of the shots which were the same as the original Juno video. We also wrote about the timings which helped us know how long to video each scene for. Our drawings of each scene were also recognisable so we knew exactly what to do for each scene.

What were your strengths and weaknesses in the group?
The strengths within the group were being able to label how long each scene was meant to be recorded for and we gave ourselves a few seconds extra for each scene for any editing needed. We also had weaknesses within the group as some of the scene weren't recorded in the right direction and the camera wasn't also very still.

Did you get all the footage you wanted?
We filmed enough scenes with plenty of time within each scene to get enough footage for our task. We also knew which scene we wanted to stop filming at and made sure we did each scene that worked towards that end point. 

What technical skills - camera and premiere - did you learn?
I learnt that during filming you can track left to right or right to left. I also learnt about certain shots such as long shot, mid shot and close up. Tilt up and down was also an obvious skill. All these skills were used to complete our Juno task. 

How does it compare to the original?
Our Juno video didn't go as well as we wanted it to as we needed to do a lot of editing by slowing our clips down to make it in time to the original video and some of the angles and direction of our scenes weren't to their full potential as they didn't match the Juno video. 

What went well - What I learnt - What I will take with me to the next production
I think the communication between the group went well as we planned and organised what we needed to do and all agreed on the same things such as who was Juno. Choosing me to be Juno was a good choice as I had the same dark hair to match the original Juno video and we used the right clothing to make us look the same. I also learnt what to do better next time which was to check the timings of when we come into the scene and when to finish the scene etc. 

Juno Storyboard